Electoral College determine the President andVice President of the United States. Select three of the following groups and for each explain how parties have changed in composition with respect to that group. It is a power that can be used in an emergency, but is rarely exercised. If people are not encouraged to engage in meaningful, political conversation and vote with the same fervor as those in swing states, it could very well weaken American Democracy and create an unfair balance in an already skewed system. This way — which I also in 2001 — would involve the two major presidential candidates themselves agreeing, solemnly and publicly long before Election Day, to abide by the national popular vote.
It's also why it left alone the issue of slavery within individual states, and why a majority of states going into the Civil War believed that they had a right to secede. That it is actually an oligarchy? The other great service that the Electoral College provides is to remove incentives to rig elections. The solution here is a simple one. As we move forward, we must consider abolishing the current framework to make way for a process that is truly just, fair, and relevant to our 21 st century needs. Senators creating a total of 538 electoral votes. In close races, fraud is much more likely to occur, and it is also much more likely to tip the election.
Politicalparties often choose Electors that are state elected officials,state party leaders, or people in the state who have a personal orpolitical affiliation with their party's Presidentialcandidate. It once again raised questions about the validity of the Electoral College as the same scenario has occurred in the 1824, 1876, and 1888 presidential elections. Electors meet in their respective state capitals electors forthe District of Columbia meet within the District on the Mondayafter the second Wednesday in December, at which time they casttheir electoral votes on separate ballots for … president andvice-president. Finally, it does not protect small states. Election, Elections, Electoral College 2145 Words 6 Pages Outdated political system: Get rid of the Electoral College Harvard, Stanford, and Cornell College are all renowned colleges, but have you heard of the Electoral College? Might seem unwise, as an outsider observing all of this. The bill preserves the Electoral College, while assuring that every vote is equal and that every voter will matter in every state in every presidential election.
There are, in some case, electors who do not vote for the person their state instructed them to. Changing the rules during or after the game is always unfair, and it could be a prescription for disaster when the Presidency of the United States is at stake. States like Alaska and Utah have largely voted Republican for the last ten Presidential Elections. So, how does a President deal with the fact that he or she is assuming a role that was largely favored for someone else? Finally, its proponents argue quite correctly that the Electoral College maintains a federal system of government and representation. A direct popular election of the president would likely have the opposite effect. Because a constitutional amendment has not been passed.
Despite itsdivisive potential, it has proven to maintain some cohesion acrossthe varied populations of the states. To do so would fundamentally alter the nature of our government and might well bring about consequences that even the reformers would come to regret. High school, Jay Asher, Middle school 1883 Words 7 Pages Thirteen Reasons Why By Jay Asher Jay Asher grew up in California, and has always had a thing for books. We should, however, recognize that even if the Electoral College is an anachronism that has long since ceased to perform as the framers expected, it fills other functions today. Vermont has 3 of 538 electoral votes, their influence would decrease to less than 1 of 436 potential votes the population of Vermont is less than the amount for 1 representative in California.
A shift of 60,000 votes in Ohio in 2004 would have defeated President Bush despite his nationwide lead of 3,500,000 votes. S election history such as the election of 2000 that should show that the system at the very least needs an overhaul and should be removed from existence. By the way, a nine year-old wrote this, so look at it carefully! Senators were initially to be appointed by state legislatures, and states were permitted to ban women from voting entirely. A national popular vote simply isn't what the Founding Fathers had in mind. The electoral college has us stuck on a hamster wheel. Yet a better question might be this: will a day arrive when those who hold power, be it political or financial, learn adequate compassion and concern for those they steward, to relinquish the privileges they allot themselves? This means if you live in a very large state, and worth more if you live in a small state. The only remarkable thing about those outcomes is that few people noticed and even fewer cared.
The Electoral College is simply a process, not a place or a person. Even today, several weeks after the election, some states are still counting ballots. First, the electoral college gives some value to smaller states. There are three main reasons why the Electoral College is outdated and should be abolished. The first we saw at work in the year 2000 election. Vermont along with about 27 other states would have to agree to reduce their electoral influence in order that California, Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio, and a few other states greatly increase their electoral influence.
Conclusion The Electoral College has performed its function for over 200 years and in over 50 presidential elections by ensuring that the President of the United States has both sufficient popular support to govern and that his popular support is sufficiently distributed throughout the country to enable him to govern effectively. But it would be less extreme as in the current system where any vote above 50. Their vote happens after the popular vote. This is true simply because it is extremely difficult for a new or minor party to win enough popular votes in enough States to have a chance of winning the presidency. But if it was strictly a popular vote process, huge population areas can be wrought with fraud and significantly sway elections. No more distorting and divisive red and blue state maps. However, such notions were quickly overtaken by the emergence of parties and the popular election of electors in place of their appointment by state legislatures.
Near misses are now frequently common. Instead of this, we should use the outrageous idea of having a person's vote count directly to a candidate a. Unfortunately, that won't be easy because 38 states will have to agree, and some smaller states may want to preserve their disproportionate share of power. Because you are not casting a direct vote for President; the electors are. The Florida recount fiasco was the result of antiquated voting equipment and a State Supreme Court that tried to change the rules after the election.
Since each state gets one vote per representative 2 senators and at least 1 congressman technically smaller states have a higher vote per capita leverage. Policies important to the citizens of 'flyover' states are not as highly prioritized as policies important to 'battleground' states when it comes to governing. Where you live determines how much, if at all, your vote matters. To avoid any possible misunderstanding or confusion, we emphasize that we are absolutely not advocating any retroactive overruling of the Electoral College. I will reference to the following countries, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and also France and Switzerland for a better understanding of the subject.