You're tired and the last thing you want to do is keep writing. One of the ways you can achieve this is through a logical and organised introduction. For this purpose, you are going to need subheadings. Discussion Chapter: Main Goals and Writing Approaches You should always keep in mind the main goals when writing your Discussion chapter. This is not the time to hurry through just because the end is in sight, say experts and students alike. Make sure to provide 1-2 recommendations for potential research in the future.
Write the discussion, just as the dissertation conclusion, primarily in the present tense. We will use the model of Description — Analysis — Synthesis, which are typically the three components readers expect to see in these two sections. A number of our findings support such a subnetworks model. Not all of this can possibly appear in your dissertation without completely overwhelming the reader. Likewise a historian may break the thesis up into time periods and do critique and evaluation throughout the whole.
This had the advantage that when writing the chapter, you are better able to consider the differences with other findings and you have the best knowledge of your own findings. Show how your study either corraborates, extends, refines, or conflicts with previous findings. The sense of trepidation was evident and I totally got it. They also relate directly to the significance of the study, which is always, in some way, to improve the human condition. In a word, the results of the study are going to be presented in this chapter the fullest and clearest manner possible. Results can take the form of data, hypotheses, models, definitions, formulas, etc.
Aside from determining what to include, the presentation of such data is also essential. Thus, the majority was in agreement. Relate your findings to the issues you raised in the introduction. Limitations of your research Present the limitations of your research in a new paragraph within the discussion. But you must be diligent in the work that you cut out.
Appendices In a qualitative or quantitative, if the study involves an organization, a letter of permission to conduct the study is required from the appropriate administrator at the organization. Interpretation of results Start your discussion with the validity of your research design. Restrict yourself using this word in the last chapter only. But avoid beginning the discussion with a long list of study limitations, says Nolen-Hoeksema. Well, guess, the loop is finally closed! The findings chapter is essentially the describe part. Notably, a subnetworks model would account for the details of the dependence of signal correlation and noise correlation on distance. In the hard sciences, there is likely an expectation of heavy numeric input and corresponding statistics to accompany the findings.
You don't want to repeat what has been said in your or. So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by the addition of this new data. Subheadings are ultimately going to be your friend throughout your. If I were to write a sequel to this thesis, what might come next? The evaluation of the research process itself, as well as of the limitations and efforts done will also be included in this section. For some, Microsoft Excel may be sufficient for basic analysis. This is an effective way to win over your audience and make them sympathetic to any true knowledge your study might have to offer. In conclusion writing, you should be careful with your tenses.
But you still have the opportunity to demonstrate how you have met that coveted gap in the research and generally made a useful contribution to knowledge. So instead of simply summarizing your data and suggesting a few obvious follow-up studies, think about presenting your data in a novel way, showing how the work might resolve an existing controversy in the literature or explaining how it connects to an entirely different literature. First, because the long journey is almost over; second, because they cannot wait to make you happy with a perfect document you are up to get. Therefore, at the end of your discussion introduction you should highlight the content that each of the subsections will cover. So the problem of the discussion chapter is a problem of creative thinking and confidence, but there are some stylistic conventions and knowledge issues that complicate the task. This also makes the proofreading process easier.
Previous reports of smooth tonotopic maps may have resulted from techniques that average the responses over multiple neurons. Finally, our data describing strong correlation between noise correlation during on-going activity and during auditory stimuli support the idea that distributed groups of interconnected neurons are coactivated during tone stimulation. It shows what you have accomplished in your college. For example, an artist may discuss each project and what it means separately. This brings us to our next student mistake — trying to do too much within one section.