. If lies and deception were necessary to gain and maintain power for a greater good greater good was defined by the ones seeking power then it was justified. And so in considering the Ends, we must view all intended consequences, not just the ones we like. Finally my opponent brings the example of a man shooting 27 mailmen. A simple example would be knocking down historic buildings as a last resort to control rat populations. Thus by not unsettling men he will be able to reassure them, and win them to himself through subsequent benefits. Now the second example is an entirely different type of scenarios.
Ryan, smelling a rat, began to complain and that eventually led to the beating. Stick close to your power base and pay attention to your staff and advisors, watching for any signs of trouble or dissent. But what about personal morality? Answer 4 This is normally used to comment on the ethics or morality of a given action. For example, He's campaigning with illegal funds on the theory that if he wins the election the end will justify the means , or The officer tricked her into admitting her guilt-the end sometimes justifies the means. I took the cup from the shrewd injun', I met Jake's gaze.
Consequentialist theories differ in how they define. This form of utilitarianism holds that what matters is the aggregate happiness; the happiness of everyone and not the happiness of any particular person. Readings in classical Chinese philosophy. But the truth is, all our actions have positive and negative consequences, as my uncontested definition states. Any mention of a brand or other trademarked entity is for the purposes of education, entertainment, or parody.
When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. Williams argues that this demands too much of moral agents—since he claims consequentialism demands that they be willing to sacrifice any and all personal projects and commitments in any given circumstance in order to pursue the most beneficent course of action possible. Where, then, does one draw the line? He cannot rely on his subjects, nor can they feel secure under him, owing to his continued and repeated wrongs. The Means: What I do in order to get to my goal. But sometimes it can happen.
Utilitarian theories, on the other hand, must answer the charge that ends do not justify the means. Now I'm needin' your terms. I was first that as was agreed when he gave me the powder to slip in the tea. As a result, it could be argued that there is a moral imperative for an agent to inform himself as much as possible about a situation before judging the appropriate course of action. An example of that was when Iraq wanted to go into Kuwait to steal their oil and rule over them.
This thing is killing a third child who I know. There are good and bad ways to be cruel, he tells us. Well-Used Cruelty So what was the difference Machiavelli was trying to highlight in these two similar tales? Archived from on December 9, 2007. A basic tenet of liberalism is the fact that an action may well be considered good, even if it doesn't yield the expected outcome, if the methods followed to achieve the same were good. Deal with your enemies all at once. Machiavelli knew full well that politicians could and did rise to power using dirty tricks.
This is simply false, the ends are the outcomes that are desired. So it is no surprise , presents a more complex argument than the famous, but simplistic, pseudo-consequentialist quote alludes out of context. This contrast is brought out in issues such as. But his writings conveyed the same idea, that morality was relative to what was needed, and what was justified to maintain power, depended on the circumstances. It means that that statement is what you thought about and you have to stick with it! Post your response as a reply to this topic. At a given signal, the soldiers killed all the senators and the richest men in the city.
Answer 5 It means that the benefits from something outweigh the harm done by the process. This statement is essentially saying that the methods of reaching a particular goal were not excuseable. Following my palms with my nose and tongue, I worked my way up the naked thighs until I reached my goal. Then what may I ask are the means? Ryan said that he had not given his consent to have the bullet removed and that he would resist and not cooperate. He threw his head back and grimaced, a violent growl escaped between his clenched teeth, every muscle tightened. People will sometimes say this phrase in a question, Do the ends justify the means? The ultimate reason for justifying sin is fear.