Alabama case, the Supreme Court pronounced the sentence of life-without-parole for children aged seventeen and below as unconstitutional Equal Justice Initiative, 2017. Courts Focus On Age Instead of Crime The juvenile courts have a strong tendency to only focus on the age of the offender rather than the actual nature and reason for the crime that they committed. In a bid to survive, they look for protection and in most instances end up joining gangs and utilizing weapons. Who are these criminals and what makes them so special? The environment in adult facilities is immensely… 1503 Words 7 Pages Holden 5 Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults? When the charge is murder, Pennsylvania is one of a handful of states that has no lower age limit for trying children as adults. A 1996 Texas study found that juveniles sentenced in adult court did receive longer terms than they would have received in juvenile court. Although some believe children should be punished for what they have done, it should not be done in such a harsh and permanent method. So, should children who pulled obdurate crimes undergo the same punishment as adults? After the crimes have been committed and the lives of these children have been radically changed, society often demands that those who commit violent crimes be tried as adults, rather than as adolescents.
But what happens when the crimes are so violent that the family is unable to recognize the victim or when the juvenile shows no remorse and then goes on to harm others. Juvenile Criminals Should Not Be Tried as Adults Today? An 11-year-old is not an adult and should never be treated like one. Meanwhile, studies have shown that juveniles prosecuted in juvenile court benefit from the services made available to them through that process, as juvenile institutions provide programs and resources specifically designed for juvenile development. They deserve to spend life in prison. Most young offenders do not become adult criminals.
It will thus hopefully lower the crime rate in society. No matter who commits it. The only slight glimmer of hope was that Clarence might, while incarcerated, grow up and become a law-abiding adult and that we would not collectively make him worse than when he went in. A crime is a crime. Correct a case of blind justice One of the problems in juvenile courts is that they have a tendency to focus on the age of the suspect and not on the criminal act and the reason that it was committed. Here are a few pointers that will help you understand why eradicating the juvenile system might be considered a negative factor. Nevertheless, some states are working on a change in the law and want to consider 16 or 17-year old children for the death penalty.
Hopefully when they re-enter, the punishments they received will be imprinted in their brain and stop them from performing any wrong again. In 1993 a seventeen year old Christopher Simmons and his friend robbed, bound, and gagged then pushed into a river Shirley Crook who then drowned to death in the river. There has been a handful of cases where a juvenile has committed a crime and sent to adult court based on the facts, but there has also been a case that given the facts the judges were to obligated to sent it to adult court. Until recently he was the presiding judge of the Juvenile Court of Santa Clara County, a division of the California Superior Court and presided over case. A significantly higher proportion of the criminal group were subsequently reincarcerated 56% vs.
Sentencing kids to a life long prison term basically kills all of their hopes and dreams because of one mistake in their life. Juveniles should not be tried in adult courts regardless of their crime because they are simply not prepared…. At this age, a child is no longer a child and can be considered an adult. Deter and minimize crimes committed by minors There is no denying that crimes committed by minors are on the rise. Hence, they revert to old behavior or worse that cost their freedom and eventually end up in prison again. I do believe that, in some specific cases, some children who conduct heinous and outrageously violent crimes should be sentenced more severely, but I still believe in psychological evaluation as the child gets older. No matter if its shop lifting or cold blood murder, charge the kids as adults and maybe they will start thinking like one and grow up.
They do not think and act like adults. If you take that away then it wouldn't be fair and unconstitutional. It argues that individuals under the age of eighteen years old are immature, irresponsible, highly susceptible to manipulation and capable of change. Reforms need to occur just as swiftly as the reforms to prosecute more juveniles in adult court began, so that the emphasis can shift back to focusing on the best interests of the child when juveniles are charged with crimes. On May 31, 2014 a twelve-year-old girl named Payton Leutner was stabbed 19 times by two of her twelve-year-old friends who were trying to please a fictional character called Slender Man.
And I have found, in my own experience, that there are salvageable young people who have committed some very horrible kinds of crimes, who are able to get their lives together and be productive members of society. Any parent would know that it makes little sense to punish a 10-year-old the same as a 17-year-old. You're out of here, society has no use for you. The following article will put forth certain arguments based on this issue, and the pros and cons of whether juveniles should be tried as adults or not. There are some circumstances where the waiver is presumed, but discretion ultimately rests with the juvenile court judge to make the waiver. It is certainly long enough to serve the needs of public protection, and enough time to rehabilitate a child.
Funneling more youth into the adult system does no good and much harm. The connections in the brain literally are not there yet. In 2010 the was being raised in the supreme court about the practice of sentencing young people under the age of 14 to life in prison without parole. The nation's highest court ruled that juvenile offenders who haven't been convicted of murder cannot be sentenced to life in prison without any chance of parole. One, their educational and employment prospects become significantly worse, thus giving them incentive and opportunity to commit crimes, and two, the stigma that they face might lead to an inability to adjust in society and may cause for repeated criminal behavior. At no other time are these differences more pronounced than during adolescence, when youths struggle with their immaturity, undeveloped decision-making abilities, impulsiveness, lack of future orientation and susceptibility to negative peer pressure. By allowing them to be tried as adults, you give them the ability to have a trial by jury.