Difference between narrow and wide span of control. Difference Between Tall and Flat Organisation Structure 2019-01-30

Difference between narrow and wide span of control Rating: 7,6/10 381 reviews

The Difference Between Having a Narrow Span of Control & a Wide Span of Control in an Organization

difference between narrow and wide span of control

Wide would be 7-9 as in some business teams. Can we compute them based on their % time managing versus % of time doing non-management tasks? After all, many of these people have started a business from the ground up and are wary of losing control over its operations. Example, most paint companys allow for 12-14 ounces of colorant for a Deep-Base and 8-12 ounces of colorant for a Medium-Base. Overloaded supervisors, loss of control. Why organizations strive for growth? In contrast, a poor ability results in limiting the span of supervision. Finally, narrow spans also reduce opportunities for the development of management. Therefore, the relationship between them will be formal.

Next

Span of control

difference between narrow and wide span of control

Article shared by Span of management directly affects the number of levels in the organization. However, the wide span has certain advantages too. Factors Determining Span : The determination of span depends upon the number of relationships that can be managed by a superior. Other studies proved that people working in tall structures produce better results as less number of members in a group can come to consensus of opinion and evaluate their decisions more thoroughly. While, with 2 subordinates, the total number of relationships is 6, with 3 subordinates, it is 18. You should always contact your attorney to determine if this information, and your interpretation of it, is appropriate to your particular situation. That is, one manager supervised four employees on average.

Next

Solved: Distinguish between narrow and wide span of control. Gi...

difference between narrow and wide span of control

Subordinates perform the work efficiently since they are considered worthy of doing so by the superiors. In this study, the goal is to refocus attention on a particular principle of management, span of control, most closely associated with Luther Gulick. The manager must spend considerable time in visiting the separate units and make use of a more time consuming formal means of communication. Under certain conditions, up to 10 personnel may be assigned to one team under a single supervisor. It is a particularly important concept for small business owners to understand because small businesses often get into trouble when the founder ends up with too wide a span of control.

Next

Organization's size and span of control

difference between narrow and wide span of control

There are six cross-relationships for the subĀ­ordinates. Wider spans of management lead to flat organization, whereas, narrow spans of management result in tall organizational structure. For the sake of simplicity, the figure represents the span for only one functional area and one level. His formula was based on a geometric increase in complexities of managing as the number of subordinates increase. Competence of managers: If managers are competent in their jobs, they can have a wide span of management.

Next

Span of Control in an Organization

difference between narrow and wide span of control

What needs to be considered is the nature of the work that subordinates are performing and how much attention each requires. Financial factors: Both narrow and wide structures have financial constraints. Flat Organisation Structure is less costly because it has less managers. Article shared by : After reading this article you will learn about:- 1. That was made possible primarily by the development of inexpensive information technology. Capacity and the mind-set of the subordinates 3. Hi, I from Germany have an important question.

Next

Difference between narrow and wide span of control

difference between narrow and wide span of control

Accordingly, executives differ from each other in their ability to supervise others. Flat Structures : These structures have a wide span of control. Managers who supervise employees that lack ability, motivation, or confidence will have to spend more time with each employee. Can anyone help, why is the formula? Managers can closely supervise activities of the subordinates. Hierarchy 2 3 4 5 Span of control 4 21 85 341 1365 5 31 156 781 3906 6 43 259 1555 9331 As an organization grows in size, it either needs more managers to control the productivity, thereby adding layers of management hierarchy, or it increases the span-of-control, increasing exponentially the management complexity. These managers need seasoning before they can efficiently manage a wide span of employees. Mistakes In Tall Organisation Structure, there are less mistakes because of close supervision and control.


Next

Organization's size and span of control

difference between narrow and wide span of control

Competence of managers is judged by their ability to make decisions related to motivational plans, leadership styles, communication channels and chains, techniques of control etc. All of the content on this page, including content associated with Express Requests, is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Delegation of authority: Ambiguous or inadequate authority delegation consumes disproportionate time of the manager in counselling and guiding subordinates. Discipline In Tall Organisation Structure, Good discipline can be maintained because there are few subordinates. Hence, in both executive and operative level, cost increases. In Flat Organisation Structure, there is a loose control because there are many subordinates.

Next

Span of Control (Management)

difference between narrow and wide span of control

In studies of British military leaders, Hamilton found that they could not effectively control more than three to six people directly. Some other factors affecting the optimal span of control include whether workers perform tasks of a routine nature which might permit a broader span of control or of great variety and complexity which might require a narrower span of control , and whether the overall business situation is stable which would indicate a broader span or dynamic which would require a narrower span. To overcome the limitations of a tall structure, many organisations reduce the number of levels in the hierarchy by downsizing the organisation. If a manager has less than the ideal number then the organization may consider that the manager is not being exploited to the best of their ability. A tall structure or a narrow span of control appears like this. The sauce is on top which makes it seem upside down. The manager normally gets involved when the staff fails to run the show.

Next

Span of Management: Meaning, Factors and Theory

difference between narrow and wide span of control

They test their theory by examining how span of control relationships among personnel in public schools influence student performance, using data on 678 Texas school districts over a 4-year period. Width: Organization structures can be described as wide with larger span of control or narrow with smaller span of control. There is more flexibility, prompt decision making, effective communication between higher level and lower level management, and improved customer interaction in case of wide span of management. Merits of a Flat Structure: 1. First, the levels are very expensive because they require more supervisory staff, which leads to larger expenses in the form of executive remuneration. This is an important topic as it is normally agreed that the wider the span of control the fewer levels of hierarchy the business needs. In the 19th and middle of 20th century, management writers determined 5 or 6 as the optimum number that a manager could effectively manage at the upper level.

Next